Fig. 3

Construction of the CC16-based prognostic signature. A Univariate Cox regression analysis of CC16 expression and clinical characteristics in the training set. B LASSO regression analysis, an upper abscissa indicated how many variables in this model have non-zero coefficients, with each curve representing a change in the coefficient of each variable. C Ten-fold cross-validation for parameter selection in the LASSO model. D In the training set, patients at high-risk have shorter OS than those at low-risk, based on a Kaplan–Meier curve (P < 0.001). E Time-dependent ROC curves of 1-year and 2-year. F Based on the risk score, AUCs for 0.5- to 2.5-year ROC curves were calculated. G A nomogram for prediction of one-, two-, and three-year survival probability in the training set. H Graphs showing the calibration curves for the nomogram prediction of survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years. I 1-year DCA curve comparison between this nomogram model and GAP index. J 2-year DCA curve comparison. K 3-year DCA curve comparison