S.no. | Domains (non-critical -NC/ critical-C) | AMSTAR 2 checklist domains | Elnayef_2017 [15] | Comisso_2021 [14] | Fernandes_2022 [16] | Sales_2023 [17] | Duan_2023 [18] | Morena_2024 [22] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NC | Did the research questions and inclusion criteria for the review include the components of PICO? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
2 | C | Contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and justify any significant deviations from the protocol | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
3 | NC | Did the review authors explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
4 | C | Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
5 | NC | Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
6 | NC | Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
7 | C | Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions? | Y | Y | N | N | N | Y |
8 | NC | Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate detail? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
9 | C | Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias in individual studies that were included in the review? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
10 | NC | Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? | N | N | Y | N | N | N |
11 | C | If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results? | Y | No meta-analysis conducted | No meta-analysis conducted | Y | Y | Y |
12 | NC | If meta-analysis was performed, did the review authors assess the potential impact of risk of bias in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis or other evidence synthesis | Y | No meta-analysis conducted | No meta-analysis conducted | Y | Y | Y |
13 | C | Did the review authors account for risk of bias in individual studies when interpreting/ discussing the results of the review? | Y | No meta-analysis conducted | No meta-analysis conducted | Y | Y | Y |
14 | NC | Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review? | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N |
15 | C | If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review? | Y | N | N | N | Y | N |
16 | NC | Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review? | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Overall assessment | Low | Low | Critically low | Low | Low | Critically low |