Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 4 Threshold effect analysis of RFM on SUI using a linear regression model

From: U‑shaped association between relative fat mass (RFM) and stress urinary incontinence: a cross‑sectional study

Threshold effect analysis

 

SUI

 

OR (95% CI)

P-value

RFM

  

 Fitting by a standard linear model

1.05 (1.05, 1.06)

 < 0.0001

Fitting by two-piecewise linear model

  

 The inflection point of RFM (K)

21.89

 

 RFM < K

0.87 (0.82, 0.92)

 < 0.0001

 RFM > K

1.06 (1.05, 1.06)

 < 0.0001

 P for log-likelihood ratio

 < 0.001

 
  1. Adjusted for all variables, including age, gender, race/ethnicity, educational level, marital status, ratio of family income to poverty, smoking status, alcohol use, hypertension, diabetes, moderate recreation activity, vigorous recreation activity, number of vaginal deliveries, cesarean deliveries, female hormones use
  2. SUI stress urinary incontinence, RFM relative fat mass, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
Back to article page

European Journal of Medical Research

ISSN: 2047-783X

Contact us